The case for safe and appropriate speedsAA bosses argued that cutting limits did not necessarily increase road safety, while transport leaders said such a move risked "slowing New Zealand down".But Patrick Morgan, from the advocacy group Cycling Action Network, said road safety should not be framed as a "productivity or compliance issue"."We deserve streets and roads that are safe and fit for purpose. Let's put humans at the front and centre, like we do with avoidable events like Pike River, Cave Creek, or Erebus."Whatever the cause of a crash, speed determines the level of harm. There's no doubt that safe speeds reduce harm, so I think it's unethical to stand by and do nothing."SourceHere Glen Koorey makes the case:Critics of lower speeds miss the pointOPINION; In the past year there has been considerable discussion around lower speeds in New Zealand; firstly...
News: June 2019
Jun
Patrick goes Dutch What can the Dutch teach New Zealand about cycling and street design? That's what cycling advocate Patrick Morgan will find out at the Planning the Cycling City summer school in Amsterdam this month. He is one of thirty people from around the world selected for the three week programme. Mr Morgan says New Zealand cities are struggling with congestion, pollution and unsafe streets. “Basic maths tells us it's not possible to cram more cars into cities. That's why cities are investing in giving people more transport choices. I aim to find out how cities are solving congestion by providing world-class public transport, and more space for people cycling, walking and scooting.” He says the programme focuses on the social science aspects of transport. “When we walk down the footpath, there are no signs telling us to keep left or not to bang into...